We offer universities a complete investigation service for reports of sexual misconduct, harassment, or hate, from the outset of the investigation through to presentation at a disciplinary hearing. We investigate both student and staff cases, including staff grievances, and work to your institution’s own policies, procedures, and regulatory framework. We also offer guidance on responding to any challenge via appeal or ombudsman. Our lead investigator has conducted more than 50 serious and/or complex investigations over the last six years.
Our team includes a member of the OIA steering group that supported development of the Good Practice Framework section on harassment and sexual misconduct. We bring regulatory expertise grounded in the very standards your investigations will be assessed against; we helped to develop them, rather than simply being familiar with them.
Safeguarding and risk at the centre
Serious misconduct cases sit where investigation, safeguarding, and risk meet. We bring senior safeguarding leadership and experience of managing the most complex, high-risk cases, including multi-agency work with the police, the Crown Prosecution Service, and probation, and an understanding of how serious sexual and violent offending intersects with university processes and duties of care. That means an investigation that stays alert to risk and to the wellbeing of everyone involved, alongside the procedural questions.
We also keep the voice of those affected at the centre of our work. Reporting parties, respondents, and witnesses are treated with fairness and care, and our experience of meaningful engagement with survivors shapes how we plan and conduct every investigation.
Why use a specialist investigator?
Student casework in higher education has become a highly specialised field. Over three decades, the expectations placed on universities across the UK and Ireland have shifted decisively: from guidance that discouraged the internal handling of serious misconduct, to frameworks that place clear duties on institutions to prevent it, respond to it, and investigate it well.
That shift carries real consequences in every jurisdiction we work in:
Requirements differ across the UK and Ireland, but the expectation that investigations are run by trained, capable people now runs through all of them.
OfS Condition E6
Providers that cannot demonstrate compliance risk their degree-awarding powers.
SFC funding condition
Acting on gender-based violence becomes a condition of funding from 2026.
Medr welfare condition
A wellbeing and safety condition of registration is due from August 2026.
NIPSO oversight
The Ombudsman hears student complaints; UUK guidance is followed voluntarily.
Consent Framework
Institutions are required to implement the national framework, overseen by the HEA.
The courts have raised the bar too, confirming that natural justice and Equality Act duties apply to university processes. An investigation that falls short puts everyone at risk: confidence in the process, outcomes that must withstand appeal or ombudsman scrutiny, and the institution’s own position. Fair, robust, and trauma-informed investigations are no longer just morally right; they are what regulators, ombuds services, and the courts now expect. You can trace how these duties have developed on our regulatory landscape page.
HE-relevant investigations
Many investigators come from legal or policing backgrounds. While their skills are valuable, they may be unfamiliar with the nuances of the higher education sector. HE investigations do not seek to prove criminal breaches of law; they determine breaches of institutional policy within the specific HE regulatory framework.
We bring years of experience in quality assurance and compliance, specifically tailored to student casework in higher education. We understand the unique procedural and regulatory requirements of universities. This matters for compliance too: under Condition E6, the OfS expects staff who undertake investigations to have the “required knowledge and skills”, from an up-to-date understanding of harassment and sexual misconduct definitions to trauma-informed practice and robust, well-documented decision-making.
Compliance in England now extends beyond harassment and sexual misconduct. Duties under the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act 2023 can cut across student conduct cases, and we are well versed in the OfS’s guidance; we will always tell you honestly if we think proceeding with an investigation may put you at risk of non-compliance. We have written for Wonkhe about where that guidance sits uneasily with student-on-student complaints.
What clients say
As an entirely new casework team, we have felt greatly supported by Jenny, who recently acted as our investigating officer for a highly sensitive and complex investigation. As well as conducting an extremely thorough and well-documented investigation, Jenny supported us to develop our understanding of sector best practice and provided a reassuring presence throughout, giving us confidence to follow our process. Her report and her presentation at panel greatly helped panel to discharge their duties with confidence.
This client rated us “strongly agree” on all six feedback measures, from communication and fairness to the final report, and has already commissioned further investigation work and training.
Get in touch
You can contact us for a quick conversation about what you need and a no-obligation quote by emailing info@campusresolve.co.uk or submit the form on our contact page linked below.
Get in touch